Skip to main content
Original Issue


I'M STANDING at the finish line for the men's invitational 100
meters at the Texas Relays last Saturday in Austin. Announcer
Bill Melton is introducing the starters in the race, saving the
most famous of them for last, at which point he turns into ring
announcer Michael Buffer, minus the spiffy tux and that Let's
get ready to rummm-ble! shtick. Melton takes 78 seconds to list
every achievement of Carl Lewis's 18-year international career
except the time he posed for a billboard in those kinky high

I'm standing there in the cool sunshine, looking down the track
at the 34-year-old Lewis in his shimmering yellow uniform, and
I'm thinking, This isn't an introduction, it's a eulogy. It's
not a race, it's a farewell tour. Somebody give this man a set
of golf clubs and walk him off the track, please.

It seems this way mostly because the last time Lewis ran in a
significant meet--in the 60 meters at the U.S. Indoor
Championships on March 2--he was jaw-droppingly bad, finishing
dead last in a morning heat. Not a final. Not a semi. A heat.
Last. It wasn't as embarrassing as Willie Mays with the New York
Mets or Joe Namath with the Los Angeles Rams, but for anyone who
had taken pleasure in the pure athletic beauty of Carl Lewis
running fast in his prime, it was mighty sad. Olympic 100-meter
champion Linford Christie of England, who had himself just
turned 36, watched that race on television. "Didn't show well,"
was his cold analysis. "I'd never write Carl off, but he should
be able to run faster than he did without training a day."

That performance followed a 1995 outdoor season in which Lewis
finished sixth in the 100 meters and second in the long jump at
the U.S. nationals, and didn't compete at the world
championships, scratching from the only individual event in
which he had qualified (the long jump) with an injured
hamstring. The process was evident: a man getting older and
slower. We have seen it many times. Lewis only seemed to make it
worse by denying the obvious. He boldly petitioned for a change
in the Atlanta Olympic schedule that would allow him to compete
in the 100 and 200 meters and the long jump, presumably so that
he could attempt to duplicate his four-gold-medal performance of
12 years ago in Los Angeles, which also included the 4x100-meter
relay. Although he was granted that schedule change, it was far
from certain that Lewis would make the U.S. team in any of the
three events, and he seemed likely not to make it in either

But then on Saturday afternoon a remarkable thing happened.
After the introduction--Lewis called it "embarrassing"--he
swallowed up Jon Drummond, the top-ranked U.S. sprinter last
year, 20 meters from the finish and won the race in a wind-aided
10.10 seconds. "My top-end speed was there," Lewis said, "and
it's been a long time since I could say that. I mean years." He
paused, smiled knowingly, and added, "There's been some doubt

Lewis is the greatest athlete in U.S. track and field history.
End of discussion. In three Olympics he has won nine medals,
eight of them gold. And yet history is oddly apathetic toward
him. His quadruple gold in 1984 (matching Jesse Owens's feat of
'36) was derided for its accompanying self-promotion. Lewis was
booed in the Los Angeles Coliseum for not taking all of his
jumps en route to winning the long jump, which he said he did
because the unnecessary jumps would have tired him for the 200.
In victory he somehow became a villain. Four years later in
Seoul he got the gold in the 100 only because Ben Johnson was
disqualified for using steroids. For Lewis there was always a
catch. Only when he anchored the U.S. to an Olympic and world
record in the 4x100-meter relay in Barcelona in 1992 did he seem
fully exultant. But most of his victories have been dampened by
expectation or misunderstanding. It seems as though he has
seldom been truly free to celebrate or to be celebrated, and
that is a shame.

This, then, is his chance. These coming Olympics have already
been given over to Michael Johnson, a huge talent who will
attempt to win gold medals in the 200 and 400 meters, an
unprecedented double. Few are watching Lewis, except in
occasional pity. He is now in that most cherished position: He
is an underdog. He is George Foreman without the flab.

A windy 10.10 won't win a gold medal (Lewis's best is a legal
9.86, run in 1991). Maybe it wouldn't even put Lewis on the U.S.
team. But to hell with that. It was the old Carl Lewis on
Saturday, slicing the air with his hands, seeming to accelerate
at 70 meters when physiology demands that he must slow down,
bringing a guttural roar from the crowd and then bursting into
celebration at the finish. There is something left. And if it is
enough to carry him to Atlanta and to put him on the podium,
then that would be a moment to cherish, to leave a sweet taste
in the mouth. Finally. For him. For the rest of us, too.

COLOR PHOTO: HARRY CABLUCK/AP In Austin, Lewis flashed his old form. [Carl Lewis]